Triple
T2954602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R (Jackson) v Attorney General |
E79901
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasClaimant |
P28688
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Countryside Alliance supporters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Countryside Alliance supporters | Statement: [R (Jackson) v Attorney General, hasClaimant, Countryside Alliance supporters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasClaimant Context triple: [R (Jackson) v Attorney General, hasClaimant, Countryside Alliance supporters]
-
A.
supportedClaimant
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, backing, or advocacy in favor of another entity who is making a claim or seeking a benefit.
-
B.
claimantsInclude
chosen
Indicates that the specified set or group of claimants contains, as members, the entities referenced.
-
C.
hasNotableClaim
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant, widely recognized statement, assertion, or claim.
-
D.
alsoClaimedBy
Indicates that the same item, statement, or resource is asserted or claimed by an additional party besides the primary one.
-
E.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1276588190a374a0b12e0f7bdf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad98ff874c81908077a90fdc5e8549 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad960c5c8881909d679912bd7d78f3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:57 p.m.