Triple
T29545912
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louisiana Choctaw |
E749629
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of the Choctaw language |
C55883
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of the Choctaw language Context triple: [Louisiana Choctaw, instanceOf, regional variety of the Choctaw language]
-
A.
regional variety of Siwu language
A regional variety of the Siwu language is a geographically and socially distinct form of Siwu characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar from other Siwu-speaking areas.
-
B.
regional variety of the Sawai language
A regional variety of the Sawai language is a geographically or socially defined form of Sawai that differs from other forms in pronunciation, vocabulary, and/or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible.
-
C.
Kickapoo language variety
A Kickapoo language variety is a specific dialect or form of the Kickapoo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features used by particular Kickapoo-speaking communities.
-
D.
Chinookan language variety
A Chinookan language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Chinookan language family traditionally spoken by Indigenous Chinookan peoples of the Pacific Northwest, characterized by its own phonological, grammatical, and lexical features.
-
E.
regional variety of the Nupe language
A regional variety of the Nupe language is a geographically or socially defined form of Nupe that exhibits distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Nupe varieties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd48691081908cecad39bac591e0 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:07 p.m.