Triple
T29538884
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaultois |
E749431
|
entity |
| Predicate | regionallyAssociatedBy |
P12445
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ferry links |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ferry links | Statement: [Gaultois, regionallyAssociatedBy, ferry links]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: regionallyAssociatedBy Context triple: [Gaultois, regionallyAssociatedBy, ferry links]
-
A.
regionOfAssociation
Indicates a broader geographic or spatial area with which an entity is functionally, contextually, or organizationally associated.
-
B.
regionallyAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities are connected or related based on sharing the same or overlapping geographic or regional context.
-
C.
realmAssociatedWith
Indicates an association or connection between an entity and a particular realm, domain, or sphere with which it is linked or to which it pertains.
-
D.
associatedAdministrativeRegion
Indicates that an entity is linked to, or falls under the jurisdiction of, a particular administrative region.
-
E.
associatedRegionFeature
Indicates that something is linked or connected to a particular geographic or regional feature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd47abb081909bd6e6a33d770fd8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd7e364a648190a1e9e1d9fc76e99e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7bb547608190a3b04dddbca6b8bc |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5 p.m.