Triple
T29509018
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eggleston |
E748597
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInCountyDurham |
P23957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Eggleston, isInCountyDurham, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInCountyDurham Context triple: [Eggleston, isInCountyDurham, true]
-
A.
isInCountySeatOf
Indicates that one entity is located within the town or city that serves as the administrative center (county seat) of a specified county.
-
B.
isInCountySeat
Indicates that one entity (typically a place or facility) is located within the county seat of a given county.
-
C.
isInCadastralCounty
Indicates that one entity is located within, and administratively belongs to, a specific cadastral county used for land and property registration.
-
D.
isInCountySeatCity
Indicates that a given location or entity is situated within the city that serves as the county seat (administrative center) of a county.
-
E.
inCounty
chosen
Indicates that one entity is geographically or administratively located within the boundaries of a specified county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd455a9c8190b40a3e8ea38cf61f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66c5d1cb48190867d8ce86724fb80 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659b62fc8190b21555d0ba54db2d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:30 p.m.