Triple
T29484815
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Linnik’s theorem on the least prime in an arithmetic progression |
E747889
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalProofUsed |
P97877
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Linnik’s dispersion method |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Linnik’s dispersion method | Statement: [Linnik’s theorem on the least prime in an arithmetic progression, originalProofUsed, Linnik’s dispersion method]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalProofUsed Context triple: [Linnik’s theorem on the least prime in an arithmetic progression, originalProofUsed, Linnik’s dispersion method]
-
A.
originalProof
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the initial or primary proof or evidence supporting another entity.
-
B.
laterProofBy
Indicates that one proof is derived or established after, and possibly building upon, an earlier proof.
-
C.
provedFrom
Indicates that one statement, theorem, or conclusion is logically derived and demonstrated to be true based on another statement or set of premises.
-
D.
requiresProofIn
Indicates that one entity must be justified, validated, or supported by formal proof within the context or framework specified by another entity.
-
E.
requiresProofOf
Indicates that one entity must provide formal evidence or documentation to validate or authorize another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd43ba30819095eb1cfc3adf525c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff9e91bba08190af04b31ad815b13a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff9e00e4808190bde8f07e6519a72c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:07 p.m.