Triple
T29484722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Siegel zero |
E747887
|
entity |
| Predicate | wouldViolate |
P166960
|
FINISHED |
| Object | standard zero-free region near s=1 for Dirichlet L-functions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standard zero-free region near s=1 for Dirichlet L-functions | Statement: [Siegel zero, wouldViolate, standard zero-free region near s=1 for Dirichlet L-functions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wouldViolate Context triple: [Siegel zero, wouldViolate, standard zero-free region near s=1 for Dirichlet L-functions]
-
A.
violationOf
Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
-
B.
violatedPrinciple
Indicates that an entity has broken, disregarded, or acted contrary to a specified rule, norm, or guiding principle.
-
C.
violationConsequences
Indicates the negative outcomes, penalties, or repercussions that result from a violation of a rule, law, or agreement.
-
D.
violationExperienced
Indicates that an entity has been subjected to or has undergone a violation, such as a breach of rights, rules, or agreed standards.
-
E.
justifiesViolenceThrough
Indicates that one party legitimizes or defends the use of violence by appealing to, or reasoning through, another factor, belief, or circumstance.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd43ba30819095eb1cfc3adf525c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66c04cebc819083ae3b4338149347 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6633ac8a88190ab0cda62bbfcf9b0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6642e676c8190af0e6b1416eed6d2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:07 p.m.