Triple
T29482171
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inpex Corporation |
E747817
|
entity |
| Predicate | isFromEconomicRegion |
P167223
|
FINISHED |
| Object | East Asia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: East Asia | Statement: [Inpex Corporation, isFromEconomicRegion, East Asia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFromEconomicRegion Context triple: [Inpex Corporation, isFromEconomicRegion, East Asia]
-
A.
isInEconomicZone
Indicates that one entity lies within the designated economic jurisdiction or exclusive economic zone of another entity.
-
B.
servesEconomicRegion
Indicates that an entity provides services, support, or functions that benefit or are directed toward a particular economic region.
-
C.
belongsToEconomicMacroregion
Indicates that one economic region or area is part of, or classified within, a larger economic macroregion.
-
D.
hasNearbyEconomicRegion
Indicates that one economic region is geographically close to or adjacent to another economic region.
-
E.
hasEconomicRegionAlongBorder
Indicates that two entities share a border along which a defined economic region or zone exists or is recognized.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd43ba30819095eb1cfc3adf525c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66bdaa8bc8190bc7153c867051558 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66339175c819080bd70f0ff7057b1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f663ff176c8190aaadb475f75daee4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:04 p.m.