Triple

T29480535
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2016 Labour Party leadership election E747770 entity
Predicate reaffirmedMandateFor P29074 FINISHED
Object Jeremy Corbyn NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jeremy Corbyn | Statement: [2016 Labour Party leadership election, reaffirmedMandateFor, Jeremy Corbyn]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reaffirmedMandateFor
Context triple: [2016 Labour Party leadership election, reaffirmedMandateFor, Jeremy Corbyn]
  • A. mandateFrom
    Indicates that one entity has been granted authoritative permission or instruction by another entity to act or decide on its behalf.
  • B. мандат
    Indicates that an entity holds an official mandate or authority to act or represent others in a specific role or context.
  • C. mandateDefinedBy
    Indicates that the scope, authority, or responsibilities of one entity’s mandate are formally established or specified by another entity or source.
  • D. natureOfMandate
    Indicates the specific type, scope, or character of authority or responsibility granted by a mandate in a given context.
  • E. reaffirmsAuthorityOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity confirms, strengthens, or restates the legitimacy or power of another entity’s authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0bd43ba30819095eb1cfc3adf525c completed April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66bd9914c8190b42a97fd73af40e6 completed May 2, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66339175c819080bd70f0ff7057b1 completed May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:03 p.m.