Triple
T29478276
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | States of Flanders |
E747709
|
entity |
| Predicate | grantedConsentFor |
P171316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extraordinary taxation in Flanders |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extraordinary taxation in Flanders | Statement: [States of Flanders, grantedConsentFor, extraordinary taxation in Flanders]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grantedConsentFor Context triple: [States of Flanders, grantedConsentFor, extraordinary taxation in Flanders]
-
A.
hasGivenConsentFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity has granted permission or approval for a specific action, process, or use involving another entity or resource.
-
B.
grantedIn
Indicates that something (such as a right, status, or permission) is formally conferred or authorized within a particular context, document, or jurisdiction.
-
C.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
D.
grantedBy
Indicates that a right, permission, or benefit is conferred or authorized by one entity to another.
-
E.
grantedWith
Indicates that one entity is given, conferred, or endowed together with another entity as part of the same granting event or condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd42cf308190bb01b20bc5b7c2d0 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6aaf50be08190a2b62a6d881f8aee |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa1c555081908787dbf76147f180 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:02 p.m.