Triple
T294733
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Homeland Security Act of 2002 |
E6067
|
entity |
| Predicate | senatePassageDate |
P10398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2002-11-19 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2002-11-19 | Statement: [Homeland Security Act of 2002, senatePassageDate, 2002-11-19]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: senatePassageDate Context triple: [Homeland Security Act of 2002, senatePassageDate, 2002-11-19]
-
A.
ratifiedOn
Indicates the date or point in time at which an agreement, treaty, or formal decision was officially approved and made valid.
-
B.
dateOfEnactment
Indicates the specific calendar date on which a law, regulation, or formal measure officially comes into force.
-
C.
dateEnacted
Indicates the date on which a law, policy, or formal measure was officially put into effect or became legally operative.
-
D.
dateOfPromulgation
Indicates the date on which a law, decree, or official act is formally proclaimed and put into effect.
-
E.
dateOfRoyalAssent
Indicates the specific date on which a proposed law or bill formally receives royal assent and thereby becomes law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2e9e273f88190ac5355d1310376ed |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9368894819093eeae4347dfcc5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2e9e0d85c8190ae52662d83ea67fe |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.