Triple
T2946961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | D. B. Caulfield |
E79525
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewedByHoldenAs |
P33440
|
FINISHED |
| Object | artistically compromised |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: artistically compromised | Statement: [D. B. Caulfield, viewedByHoldenAs, artistically compromised]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewedByHoldenAs Context triple: [D. B. Caulfield, viewedByHoldenAs, artistically compromised]
-
A.
viewedBy
Indicates that something has been seen, observed, or watched by a particular entity.
-
B.
viewedBySomeAs
Indicates that at least one observer or group perceives or interprets an entity in a particular way or role.
-
C.
viewOfWill
Indicates a relationship where something represents, expresses, or reflects the will, intention, or volition of an agent.
-
D.
viewHeldBy
chosen
Indicates that a particular view, perspective, or opinion is possessed, maintained, or endorsed by a specific entity.
-
E.
viewOver
Indicates that one entity has a visual perspective overlooking or facing another entity, typically providing a vantage point onto it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1089588190b74d9e2505e45762 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad98b5916c8190b1163bf0b7fa136a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad960a70ac8190816b5ae3e8631031 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:56 p.m.