Triple

T29463536
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yosemite E747309 entity
Predicate hasMelodicFlow P102134 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Yosemite, hasMelodicFlow, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMelodicFlow
Context triple: [Yosemite, hasMelodicFlow, true]
  • A. hasMelodicHook
    Indicates that a musical piece contains a distinctive, memorable melodic phrase designed to catch the listener’s attention.
  • B. isMelodic chosen
    Indicates that something possesses a tuneful, harmonious, or musically pleasing quality.
  • C. hasMelody
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular melody.
  • D. hasMelodicRange
    Indicates that a musical piece, phrase, or part spans a specific interval between its lowest and highest pitches.
  • E. hasMoreMelodicSoundThan
    Indicates that the sound produced by one entity is judged to be more melodic, tuneful, or musically pleasing than the sound produced by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0bd4125f88190b56104591351619c completed April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd49f6dbac81909744373a357b7982 completed May 8, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd48ed68f481908374183c66a6b055 completed May 8, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:51 p.m.