Triple

T29423491
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject James of the Fiery Face E746217 entity
Predicate hasDynastyOfReferent P159148 FINISHED
Object House of Stewart NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: House of Stewart | Statement: [James of the Fiery Face, hasDynastyOfReferent, House of Stewart]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDynastyOfReferent
Context triple: [James of the Fiery Face, hasDynastyOfReferent, House of Stewart]
  • A. refersToPersonWithDynasty
    Indicates that one entity makes reference to a person specifically identified or characterized by their association with a particular dynasty.
  • B. belongsToDynasticHistory
    Indicates that something is part of, or associated with, a particular dynastic historical period or lineage.
  • C. associatedWithDynasty
    Indicates that an entity has a historical, political, cultural, or familial connection to a specific dynasty.
  • D. hasDynast chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or ruled by a particular dynasty.
  • E. isDynastic
    Indicates that a relationship, status, or succession is based on or belongs to a hereditary ruling family or lineage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0a7a06e0081908add494075912eb4 completed April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66a6aa3d08190887bfa4eed48faeb completed May 2, 2026, 9:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66339175c819080bd70f0ff7057b1 completed May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:07 p.m.