Triple
T29401619
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Troubadour field |
E745657
|
entity |
| Predicate | developmentConceptDiscussed |
P180435
|
FINISHED |
| Object | LNG export |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: LNG export | Statement: [Troubadour field, developmentConceptDiscussed, LNG export]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developmentConceptDiscussed Context triple: [Troubadour field, developmentConceptDiscussed, LNG export]
-
A.
developmentConceptOptions
Indicates that there are selectable conceptual approaches or strategies available for how a development (e.g., project, product, or system) can be carried out or structured.
-
B.
projectConcept
Indicates that one entity is the conceptual idea, theme, or underlying notion associated with a particular project.
-
C.
featuredConcept
Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
-
D.
detailsConcept
Indicates that one entity provides additional information, clarification, or elaboration about a concept represented by another entity.
-
E.
technologyConcept
Indicates a relationship where one entity represents or embodies a technological idea, principle, or method conceptually associated with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79eb7d081908c67197a5f347e68 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f74062b9388190b30546cf700a825c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73c802b848190b61a416b7488bd96 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f74061c440819080434155c2d60341 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:51 p.m.