Triple
T29401552
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greater Sunrise |
E745655
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOperatorInterestStructure |
P178605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | joint venture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: joint venture | Statement: [Greater Sunrise, hasOperatorInterestStructure, joint venture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOperatorInterestStructure Context triple: [Greater Sunrise, hasOperatorInterestStructure, joint venture]
-
A.
hasCampOperator
Indicates that a camp is operated or managed by a specific operator or organization.
-
B.
hasOperatorSection
Indicates that something includes or is associated with a specific section intended for operators or operational use.
-
C.
hasOperatorContractStart
Indicates the date on which an operator’s contractual agreement with another entity begins.
-
D.
hasOperatorContractAuthority
Indicates that an entity has the legal or formal authority to enter into and manage operator contracts on behalf of another party or organization.
-
E.
hasOwnerOperator
Indicates that an entity is owned and operated by a specified party, combining both ownership and operational responsibility in a single relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79eb7d081908c67197a5f347e68 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7117e55908190a67105e92bc4830f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f380690819090cc34763ba460ed |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7117cf2188190b29e36fc1e342c60 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:51 p.m.