Triple
T29390529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SDIO |
E745357
|
entity |
| Predicate | canCombine |
P60771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | flash storage and I/O on one card |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: flash storage and I/O on one card | Statement: [SDIO, canCombine, flash storage and I/O on one card]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canCombine Context triple: [SDIO, canCombine, flash storage and I/O on one card]
-
A.
canMerge
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
-
B.
knownForCombining
Indicates a relationship where one entity is recognized or notable for bringing together or merging multiple elements, entities, or aspects into a unified whole.
-
C.
laterCombination
Indicates that one entity is a combination or composite that occurs after, or is formed subsequent to, another entity or state.
-
D.
combinedIn
Indicates that two or more entities are merged, joined, or used together to form a single combined whole or context.
-
E.
hasComb
Indicates that an entity possesses or is equipped with a comb.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79dfabc81908755382ee47791e2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f669d648488190b7d3060432eb0eeb |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f4f7a88190b93c60d76b86c912 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:42 p.m.