Triple
T29390203
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SDXC |
E745351
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleWithFileSystem |
P44872
|
FINISHED |
| Object | exFAT |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exFAT | Statement: [SDXC, compatibleWithFileSystem, exFAT]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleWithFileSystem Context triple: [SDXC, compatibleWithFileSystem, exFAT]
-
A.
fileSystemSupport
chosen
Indicates that one entity (such as a system, application, or device) is capable of recognizing, accessing, and correctly operating with a particular file system or set of file systems.
-
B.
supportsRegionalFileSystems
Indicates that an entity provides compatibility with or functionality for file systems specific to particular regions or locales.
-
C.
fileSystemFamily
Indicates that two file systems belong to the same family or type, sharing a common design, lineage, or implementation characteristics.
-
D.
notCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities cannot function together properly or are unsuitable for joint use or interaction.
-
E.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79dfabc81908755382ee47791e2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71f8ee0688190bd025f27993452d3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc405c08190863565609a4c8499 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:41 p.m.