Triple

T29389524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject android.print.PrinterId E745337 entity
Predicate hashCodeConsistency P166715 FINISHED
Object consistent with equals() LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consistent with equals() | Statement: [android.print.PrinterId, hashCodeConsistency, consistent with equals()]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hashCodeConsistency
Context triple: [android.print.PrinterId, hashCodeConsistency, consistent with equals()]
  • A. hasConsistency
    Indicates that one entity maintains a stable, uniform, or coherent state, behavior, or set of properties in relation to another entity or over time.
  • B. requiresForConsistency
    Indicates that one element must be present or satisfied for another element to remain logically or functionally consistent.
  • C. requiresHashableElements
    Indicates that the relationship or operation can only be applied when all involved elements support hashing (i.e., can be used as keys in hash-based structures).
  • D. isInconsistent
    Indicates that there is a logical or factual contradiction within or between the entities or statements involved.
  • E. hasWaveConsistency
    Indicates that the related entities maintain a stable, coherent pattern or behavior across successive waves, phases, or iterations.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0a79dfabc81908755382ee47791e2 completed April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f669d578608190962d35116a01420c completed May 2, 2026, 9:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f660f4f7a88190b93c60d76b86c912 completed May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f661b47d088190934f63884a203261 completed May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:41 p.m.