Triple
T29384040
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Council Decision of the European Union |
E745204
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayLayDown |
P166701
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rules for implementation of EU policies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rules for implementation of EU policies | Statement: [Council Decision of the European Union, mayLayDown, rules for implementation of EU policies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayLayDown Context triple: [Council Decision of the European Union, mayLayDown, rules for implementation of EU policies]
-
A.
laidDown
Indicates that an entity places or sets another entity down into a resting or horizontal position.
-
B.
lieAlong
Indicates that one object or feature is positioned adjacent to and extending in roughly the same direction as another.
-
C.
laidDownBy
Indicates that something was established, created, or set as a rule, principle, or foundation by a particular agent.
-
D.
laidDownAs
Indicates that one entity has been formally established, stipulated, or prescribed as a rule, principle, or condition for another.
-
E.
maySit
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to sit on or in another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79cfd5481909b4dde750cb8d2c6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f669d007d08190bf0df2edbdb3e171 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f4f7a88190b93c60d76b86c912 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f661b47d088190934f63884a203261 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:37 p.m.