Triple
T29372140
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OPM |
E744881
|
entity |
| Predicate | timers |
P60696
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2 hardware timers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2 hardware timers | Statement: [OPM, timers, 2 hardware timers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: timers Context triple: [OPM, timers, 2 hardware timers]
-
A.
hasTimer
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or controlled by a timer mechanism that measures or limits a duration or interval.
-
B.
timingParameter
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies or controls a temporal setting, constraint, or configuration parameter that determines the timing behavior of another entity or process.
-
C.
timeLimited
Indicates that the relationship or action is constrained to occur or remain valid only within a specific, limited time period.
-
D.
timescale
Indicates the temporal scale or duration over which a process, relationship, or effect occurs or is evaluated.
-
E.
timingProvider
Indicates that one entity serves as the source or controller of timing information or synchronization for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79ba954819094597628112c6091 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f669ab36008190bc2e3c5dbdd2050d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66339175c819080bd70f0ff7057b1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:28 p.m.