Triple
T29372132
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OPM |
E744881
|
entity |
| Predicate | polyphonyType |
P124957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 8-voice polyphonic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8-voice polyphonic | Statement: [OPM, polyphonyType, 8-voice polyphonic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: polyphonyType Context triple: [OPM, polyphonyType, 8-voice polyphonic]
-
A.
polyphony
Indicates a relationship where multiple independent melodic or vocal lines occur simultaneously, creating a layered or harmonically interwoven texture.
-
B.
polyphonicSingingStyle
Indicates a singing style in which multiple independent vocal lines or melodies are performed simultaneously.
-
C.
polyphonicChannels
chosen
Indicates that an entity supports or involves multiple independent audio or musical channels that can sound simultaneously (polyphony).
-
D.
vocalHarmonyType
Indicates the specific kind or style of vocal harmony relationship that exists between the involved vocal parts or voices.
-
E.
isMonophonic
Indicates that something consists of a single melodic line or voice, without simultaneous independent melodic parts.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79ba954819094597628112c6091 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f669ab36008190bc2e3c5dbdd2050d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f4f7a88190b93c60d76b86c912 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:28 p.m.