Triple
T29360190
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Academy in Athens |
E744568
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedUnderLeadershipOf |
P40576
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Carneades |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carneades | Statement: [New Academy in Athens, developedUnderLeadershipOf, Carneades]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedUnderLeadershipOf Context triple: [New Academy in Athens, developedUnderLeadershipOf, Carneades]
-
A.
developmentLedBy
chosen
Indicates that the development of something is directed, managed, or overseen by a particular agent or entity.
-
B.
developedUnderAuspicesOf
Indicates that something was developed under the sponsorship, guidance, or official authority of a particular organization or entity.
-
C.
hadLeadershipFrom
Indicates that one entity received leadership, guidance, or direction from another entity.
-
D.
organizedDuringLeadershipOf
Indicates that an event or activity was organized while a specific person or group held a leadership position.
-
E.
collaborationLedBy
Indicates that a collaborative effort or project is directed, coordinated, or overseen by a specific leading entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79aee588190b490f19d93c6e52d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:16 p.m.