Triple

T29321856
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stewjon E743535 entity
Predicate hasFictionalMedium P194001 FINISHED
Object film tie-in material LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: film tie-in material | Statement: [Stewjon, hasFictionalMedium, film tie-in material]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalMedium
Context triple: [Stewjon, hasFictionalMedium, film tie-in material]
  • A. hasFictionalUniverseMedium chosen
    Indicates that a fictional universe is presented or expressed through a particular medium (such as a book, film, game, etc.).
  • B. hasFictionalType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category that is fictional rather than real.
  • C. hasFictionalProductionType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or category of fictional production (such as a genre, format, or style).
  • D. hasFictionalContent
    Indicates that something contains or includes material that is imaginary, invented, or not intended to represent real events or facts.
  • E. hasFictionalDepictions
    Indicates that an entity is represented or portrayed in one or more fictional works or narratives.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f09125f784819080f4e9fce9fe624f completed April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd91a5dad8819093eeeef527027890 completed May 8, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8f65fe9081908902500a3228d935 completed May 8, 2026, 7:23 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:23 p.m.