Triple
T29296957
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wednesbury |
E742858
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineNamedAfter |
P90230
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wednesbury unreasonableness |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wednesbury unreasonableness | Statement: [Wednesbury, legalDoctrineNamedAfter, Wednesbury unreasonableness]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineNamedAfter Context triple: [Wednesbury, legalDoctrineNamedAfter, Wednesbury unreasonableness]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
C.
involvedInLegalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that an entity plays a role in the formation, interpretation, application, or development of a particular legal doctrine.
-
D.
hasLawNamedAfter
Indicates that a law or piece of legislation is named in honor of, or directly after, a particular entity.
-
E.
legalSystemBasis
Indicates the foundational legal framework, tradition, or set of principles on which a legal system is based.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0912323c48190b9a24ef8cf359225 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd6f9d600c8190acf495b7fc632e4b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd6e98a2948190a9f78c415ad23b8c |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:07 p.m.