Triple

T29272074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mersyankh III E742144 entity
Predicate hasFalseDoor P181145 FINISHED
Object false door stela in tomb G 7530-7540 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false door stela in tomb G 7530-7540 | Statement: [Mersyankh III, hasFalseDoor, false door stela in tomb G 7530-7540]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFalseDoor
Context triple: [Mersyankh III, hasFalseDoor, false door stela in tomb G 7530-7540]
  • A. hasNumberOfFalseDoors
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific count of false doors (door-like architectural features that do not function as actual entrances or exits).
  • B. hasStageDoor
    Indicates that a venue or building possesses a dedicated stage door used for performers and staff to access backstage areas.
  • C. hasDoor
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is equipped with a door that provides access to or through it.
  • D. hasSecretExits
    Indicates that an entity possesses one or more hidden or concealed exits that are not part of its normal, visible access points.
  • E. hasSecretExit
    Indicates that something includes or is connected to a hidden or concealed way out.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0912124d48190a046642b69407f4c completed April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 completed May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 completed May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f762651e088190baa21f25378a6065 completed May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:48 p.m.