Triple

T29240116
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Albertine Simonet E741295 entity
Predicate causesInNarrator P694 FINISHED
Object intense jealousy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intense jealousy | Statement: [Albertine Simonet, causesInNarrator, intense jealousy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: causesInNarrator
Context triple: [Albertine Simonet, causesInNarrator, intense jealousy]
  • A. causeInStory
    Indicates that one event, action, or state functions as the cause of another within the narrative structure of a story.
  • B. hasCauseNarrative
    Indicates that one entity provides a narrative or explanatory account of the cause or causal background of another entity or event.
  • C. narratorIn
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice within the context of another entity (such as a work, scene, or narrative segment).
  • D. causeOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity brings about, produces, or is responsible for the occurrence or existence of another entity or event.
  • E. causeStatedByPerpetrators
    Indicates that the stated cause or reason for an event or action is the one explicitly given by the perpetrators themselves.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0911dd6fc819097d1abb287016489 completed April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 completed May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff completed May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:30 p.m.