Triple
T29239978
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Time Regained |
E741292
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionFunction |
P166447
|
FINISHED |
| Object | provides overall meaning of the novel cycle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: provides overall meaning of the novel cycle | Statement: [Time Regained, conclusionFunction, provides overall meaning of the novel cycle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionFunction Context triple: [Time Regained, conclusionFunction, provides overall meaning of the novel cycle]
-
A.
conclusionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of conclusion associated with an argument, inference, or reasoning process.
-
B.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
C.
concludedWith
Indicates that an event, process, or interaction ended or was finalized by a specific outcome, action, or state.
-
D.
concludesAbout
Indicates that one entity forms or states a conclusion regarding another entity or its properties.
-
E.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0911dd6fc819097d1abb287016489 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6648570cc819095f42f2b8233d918 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65c24f8b48190af81b575f3c15be5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f65fb2ead08190b06677d4d6ea1ea8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:30 p.m.