Triple
T29225719
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | O Pato |
E740928
|
entity |
| Predicate | albumOfNotableCoverProducedBy |
P65373
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Herb Alpert |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Herb Alpert | Statement: [O Pato, albumOfNotableCoverProducedBy, Herb Alpert]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: albumOfNotableCoverProducedBy Context triple: [O Pato, albumOfNotableCoverProducedBy, Herb Alpert]
-
A.
notableCoverAlbum
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a notable album consisting primarily of cover versions of songs originally by another entity.
-
B.
notableAlbumArtwork
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having particularly distinctive, influential, or otherwise noteworthy album artwork.
-
C.
notableCover
Indicates that one entity is a particularly well-known or significant cover version or adaptation of another entity.
-
D.
notableCoverReleaseYear
Indicates the year in which a particularly notable or significant cover version of a work was released.
-
E.
hasCoverArtFeaturing
Indicates that one entity’s cover art visually features or depicts another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cbb12bc81908c1971d9de9a8d2a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6645ba71c81908044ade6ab577018 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f663362c008190a22afed262f1e426 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:16 p.m.