Triple
T29220955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Images and Words tour |
E740801
|
entity |
| Predicate | labelForAssociatedAlbum |
P34608
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Atco Records |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Atco Records | Statement: [Images and Words tour, labelForAssociatedAlbum, Atco Records]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: labelForAssociatedAlbum Context triple: [Images and Words tour, labelForAssociatedAlbum, Atco Records]
-
A.
hasAssociatedAlbum
Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific album with which it is related or connected.
-
B.
albumLabel
chosen
Indicates the record label or company that released or distributed a particular music album.
-
C.
recordLabelAssociated
Indicates that one entity (typically an artist or release) is or has been signed to, released under, or otherwise officially affiliated with a particular record label.
-
D.
belongsToAlbum
Indicates that a musical track or piece is part of, or included within, a specific album.
-
E.
albumNickname
Indicates that an album has an alternate or informal name (a nickname) by which it may also be known.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cba2f808190a2746477d4e8345b |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6691f5e188190b12c7b2eb729a45e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659b62fc8190b21555d0ba54db2d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:15 p.m.