Triple
T29219660
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Train of Thought |
E740774
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasExtendedCompositions |
P177327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Train of Thought, hasExtendedCompositions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExtendedCompositions Context triple: [Train of Thought, hasExtendedCompositions, true]
-
A.
hasExtendedStructure
Indicates that an entity possesses an additional or elongated structural component beyond its basic or standard form.
-
B.
hasCompositionBy
Indicates that something (such as a work or piece) is composed or created by a particular composer or author.
-
C.
hasCompositionType
Indicates that one entity is composed of or formed by another entity in a specific structural or material way.
-
D.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
-
E.
hasNotableComposition
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific composition (e.g., musical, artistic, or written work) that is considered notable or significant.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cba2f808190a2746477d4e8345b |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6fb93224881908fc66fe76115fcdb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f969b4cc8190afb473a2d8b110bc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6fb17d5ec81909091e37e1ddbe577 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:15 p.m.