Triple

T29213951
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Padma Lahari E740614 entity
Predicate hasFictionalDomain P194804 FINISHED
Object corporate world LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: corporate world | Statement: [Padma Lahari, hasFictionalDomain, corporate world]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalDomain
Context triple: [Padma Lahari, hasFictionalDomain, corporate world]
  • A. hasFictionalScope
    Indicates that something pertains to, applies within, or is limited to a fictional or imagined context rather than real-world scope.
  • B. hasFictionalContent
    Indicates that something contains or includes material that is imaginary, invented, or not intended to represent real events or facts.
  • C. hasFictionalType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category that is fictional rather than real.
  • D. hasFictionalForm
    Indicates that an entity has a counterpart or representation that exists within a fictional or imaginary context.
  • E. hasFictionalProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a property, attribute, or characteristic that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cba2f808190a2746477d4e8345b completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd884cb2b48190b6acd473430d9e19 completed May 8, 2026, 6:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8709ca208190a8bab836f0156af5 completed May 8, 2026, 6:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd884b9d908190833de9500ff6d62a completed May 8, 2026, 6:52 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:12 p.m.