Triple

T29200140
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mrs. Van Hopper E740244 entity
Predicate relationshipToUnnamedNarrator P203032 FINISHED
Object employer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: employer | Statement: [Mrs. Van Hopper, relationshipToUnnamedNarrator, employer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToUnnamedNarrator
Context triple: [Mrs. Van Hopper, relationshipToUnnamedNarrator, employer]
  • A. narratorRole
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator of another entity (such as a story, text, or media work), specifying the narrative role or function it performs.
  • B. narratorType
    Indicates the narrative perspective or role from which a story or account is being told.
  • C. narratorCharacterName
    Indicates that a given character is the one serving as the narrator, and specifies the name used for that narrator.
  • D. narratorOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice for another entity, such as a text, story, or media work.
  • E. narratorBasedOn
    Indicates that a narrative’s narrator is modeled on, inspired by, or derived from a particular real or fictional entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb974108190b7e86ca489a6ebb6 completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0117b6539c8190be7d231e891fe546 completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a011762f7ec8190afc884b92419d33f completed May 10, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a0117b4eec88190a761ac126f5cc8e2 completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:06 p.m.