Triple
T29199729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Labour Front |
E740235
|
entity |
| Predicate | succeededInProminenceBy |
P163669
|
FINISHED |
| Object | People’s Action Party |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: People’s Action Party | Statement: [Labour Front, succeededInProminenceBy, People’s Action Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: succeededInProminenceBy Context triple: [Labour Front, succeededInProminenceBy, People’s Action Party]
-
A.
successorInProminence
chosen
Indicates that one entity has risen to take over the leading role, status, or prominence previously held by another entity.
-
B.
hasProminence
Indicates that one entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
-
C.
gainedProminenceFor
Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable specifically because of another entity, action, or achievement.
-
D.
elevatedInProminenceBy
Indicates that an entity’s prominence, status, or visibility is increased as a result of the actions or influence of another entity.
-
E.
gainedProminenceUnder
Indicates that an entity rose to greater importance, influence, or recognition during the leadership, authority, or period associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cb974108190b7e86ca489a6ebb6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:06 p.m.