Triple

T29180914
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Consolations E739741 entity
Predicate containsReligiousInfluence P196695 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Consolations, containsReligiousInfluence, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsReligiousInfluence
Context triple: [Consolations, containsReligiousInfluence, true]
  • A. laterInfluencedByReligion
    Indicates that an entity was influenced at a later time by a particular religion or religious tradition.
  • B. influencedReligion
    Indicates that one entity has had a shaping or modifying effect on the religious beliefs, practices, or traditions of another entity.
  • C. influencedByReligion
    Indicates that an entity’s characteristics, decisions, or development are shaped or affected by religious beliefs, practices, or institutions.
  • D. hasEcclesiasticalInfluenceIn
    Indicates that an entity holds religious or church-related authority, impact, or sway within a specified region, institution, or context.
  • E. doctrinalInfluenceOn
    Indicates that one doctrine has influenced, shaped, or contributed to the development of another doctrine.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb74c2c8190ad396487fcb4fde6 completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe629b4fa481908467c7c41b77f0c6 completed May 8, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe61bb260c819083f9378a3a06ca47 completed May 8, 2026, 10:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe629a8d4c8190b4aa4dee39efc0a6 completed May 8, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:57 a.m.