Triple

T29173600
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Faustinus and Jovita E739540 entity
Predicate liturgicalColorAssociated P4602 FINISHED
Object red LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red | Statement: [Faustinus and Jovita, liturgicalColorAssociated, red]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: liturgicalColorAssociated
Context triple: [Faustinus and Jovita, liturgicalColorAssociated, red]
  • A. hasLiturgicalColor chosen
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific liturgical color used in religious rites or ceremonies.
  • B. liturgicalTheme
    Indicates the religious or worship-related theme that characterizes or frames a liturgical action, text, or event.
  • C. excludesLiturgicalColor
    Indicates that a particular liturgical color is not permitted or is intentionally omitted in a given liturgical context, usage, or celebration.
  • D. liturgicalCelebration
    Indicates that one entity conducts or is associated with a formal act of worship or religious rite in honor of another entity, event, or sacred mystery.
  • E. liturgicalAssociation
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is connected to another through shared or relevant liturgical use, function, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb6394c8190ab7842c48e699e2a completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6633dd454819081c59443e6d3197c completed May 2, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65c24f8b48190af81b575f3c15be5 completed May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:53 a.m.