Triple
T29171527
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | No Limitations |
E739479
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCollaborativeArtist |
P175322
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lil Bibby |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lil Bibby | Statement: [No Limitations, hasCollaborativeArtist, Lil Bibby]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCollaborativeArtist Context triple: [No Limitations, hasCollaborativeArtist, Lil Bibby]
-
A.
hasArtistSiblingCollaboration
Indicates that two artist siblings have worked together on a shared artistic project or collaboration.
-
B.
hasAdditionalArtists
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more extra contributing artists beyond the primary or main artist.
-
C.
musicalCollaborator
Indicates a relationship where two or more entities work together in creating, performing, or producing music.
-
D.
hasCollaboratedIn
Indicates that two or more entities have worked together on a shared project, task, or activity.
-
E.
hasNotableCollaborationType
Indicates a specific kind or category of significant collaborative relationship that exists between entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cb6394c8190ab7842c48e699e2a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0045a7b4c081908e4dedabda7cf790 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0042b148a48190974b173f352e4b7f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:52 a.m.