Triple

T29149645
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kaa (Rudyard Kipling character) E738868 entity
Predicate alignmentInOriginalWork P166556 FINISHED
Object benevolent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: benevolent | Statement: [Kaa (Rudyard Kipling character), alignmentInOriginalWork, benevolent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentInOriginalWork
Context triple: [Kaa (Rudyard Kipling character), alignmentInOriginalWork, benevolent]
  • A. originallyAlignedWith
    Indicates that an entity was initially in agreement, support, or association with another entity or group, regardless of any later changes in stance or affiliation.
  • B. alignmentInOriginalComics
    Indicates the moral or factional stance a character holds in the original comic source material (e.g., hero, villain, neutral).
  • C. alignmentInStory
    Indicates how a character’s moral or ethical stance (e.g., good, neutral, evil) is portrayed within the context of a specific story.
  • D. hasAlignmentInFiction
    Indicates that a fictional character, group, or entity possesses a specific moral or ethical alignment within a fictional setting.
  • E. alignmentAtIntroduction
    Indicates that two entities share a particular alignment or stance at the moment one is first introduced.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb46f148190874eb8576a447567 completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f662a439c88190985b014077e75ecc completed May 2, 2026, 8:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f660f082508190a95a7888ad66cb2e completed May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6617a7e7c81908cfac4a2250797ee completed May 2, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:41 a.m.