Triple

T29137925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Journal 3 E738553 entity
Predicate otherIn-universeAuthors P173255 FINISHED
Object Dipper Pines NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dipper Pines | Statement: [Journal 3, otherIn-universeAuthors, Dipper Pines]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: otherIn-universeAuthors
Context triple: [Journal 3, otherIn-universeAuthors, Dipper Pines]
  • A. fictionalUniverseAuthor
    Indicates that an author is the creator or primary writer responsible for a given fictional universe.
  • B. fictionalUniverseOwner
    Indicates that one entity is the creator, rights holder, or controlling owner of a particular fictional universe or setting.
  • C. workAuthoredInUniverse
    Indicates that a creative work is set within, or narratively belongs to, a particular fictional or conceptual universe.
  • D. sharesFictionalUniverseWith
    Indicates that two entities are set within the same fictional universe or continuity, such that their stories coexist in a shared narrative world.
  • E. authorshipInFiction
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a fictional work in which another entity appears or is represented.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb3adb48190a9e0e169cd026634 completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b342499c8190b85009a3f0f179e4 completed May 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b14d7d508190bc7d4c89dfba4a32 completed May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b2a31e008190aacef03c2ebe5787 completed May 3, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:35 a.m.