Triple
T29125503
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy |
E738213
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimToDescentFrom |
P30356
|
FINISHED |
| Object | illegitimate branch of the House of Valois |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: illegitimate branch of the House of Valois | Statement: [Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, claimToDescentFrom, illegitimate branch of the House of Valois]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimToDescentFrom Context triple: [Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, claimToDescentFrom, illegitimate branch of the House of Valois]
-
A.
claimedDescentFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity asserts or maintains that it is descended from, or originates genealogically from, another entity.
-
B.
dynasticClaimBasis
Indicates the basis or grounds on which a person or lineage asserts a dynastic right or claim to rule.
-
C.
dynasticClaim
Indicates a relationship where one party asserts a hereditary or lineage-based right to rule, inherit, or hold authority over another.
-
D.
lineageClaim
Indicates a claim or assertion that one entity is descended from, or belongs to the ancestral line of, another entity.
-
E.
claimedFather
Indicates that one entity is asserted or alleged to be the father of another entity, without guaranteeing the claim’s truth.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cb29cdc8190afa55444553de60c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bbf6e33c819086e5176d64e7a614 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6ba6b1e6c8190adf9d6a257e0b744 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:28 a.m.