Triple
T29118186
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution of 1857 of Mexico |
E737103
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedLawPackage |
P80384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Leyes de Reforma |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leyes de Reforma | Statement: [Constitution of 1857 of Mexico, relatedLawPackage, Leyes de Reforma]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedLawPackage Context triple: [Constitution of 1857 of Mexico, relatedLawPackage, Leyes de Reforma]
-
A.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
B.
linkedLaw
chosen
Indicates that there is a connection or reference between an entity and a specific law or legal provision.
-
C.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
D.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
E.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077ed54e08190bb02a744e8121a66 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00c9ddd62881909859a36b114a4132 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00c939b88881909d5353db4265e572 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:23 a.m.