Triple

T29102976
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commentary on Plato's Cratylus E736686 entity
Predicate treatsDialogueAs P170679 FINISHED
Object theological text LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theological text | Statement: [Commentary on Plato's Cratylus, treatsDialogueAs, theological text]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatsDialogueAs
Context triple: [Commentary on Plato's Cratylus, treatsDialogueAs, theological text]
  • A. dialogueType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of dialogue occurring between entities (e.g., question-answer, negotiation, instruction).
  • B. dialogueFeature
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or involves a particular characteristic, property, or element of a dialogue or conversational exchange with another entity.
  • C. dialogue
    Indicates that two or more entities are engaged in an exchange of spoken or written communication with each other.
  • D. hasDialogueTrait
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic or quality related to dialogue or conversational behavior.
  • E. hasDialogueIn
    Indicates that an entity participates in or contains spoken or written dialogue within a specified context, such as a scene, work, or medium.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077ec765c81909474c88bcc8bab43 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f693ffa7908190aa4c451b16df9be6 completed May 3, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f690eb1e948190aab41a89969519a5 completed May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6938244648190a553b532387b812c completed May 3, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:13 a.m.