Triple

T29102912
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commentary on Plato's Alcibiades I E736685 entity
Predicate authorInOriginalLanguage P23529 FINISHED
Object Proclus NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proclus | Statement: [Commentary on Plato's Alcibiades I, authorInOriginalLanguage, Proclus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorInOriginalLanguage
Context triple: [Commentary on Plato's Alcibiades I, authorInOriginalLanguage, Proclus]
  • A. originalLanguageAuthor
    Indicates that an author created a work in a particular original language.
  • B. authorOrigin
    Indicates that an author has a specific place, region, or country as their origin or background.
  • C. originAuthor chosen
    Indicates that an entity is the original creator or author of another entity (such as a work, document, or idea).
  • D. authorOfTranslation
    Indicates that one entity is the person or agent who produced a translated version of a work originally created in another language.
  • E. authorTraditionallyAscribedTo
    Indicates that authorship of a work is customarily or historically attributed to an entity, even if definitive proof of authorship may be uncertain or disputed.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077ec765c81909474c88bcc8bab43 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7be53890081909b1d93f30a8f31c6 completed May 3, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7bccacbac8190978976324c67db28 completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:13 a.m.