Triple
T29098945
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Black |
E735088
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRelatedIdentity |
P108480
|
FINISHED |
| Object | African American |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: African American | Statement: [Black, hasRelatedIdentity, African American]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelatedIdentity Context triple: [Black, hasRelatedIdentity, African American]
-
A.
hasIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the same as, or is identified as, another specific entity or identifier.
-
B.
relatedIdentity
chosen
Indicates that two identities are connected or associated with each other in some meaningful way, such as being alternate, linked, or otherwise contextually related.
-
C.
hasRelation
Indicates that there exists some specified relationship or association between two entities.
-
D.
hasIdentityStatus
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular identity-related state or condition (such as confirmed, provisional, or unknown).
-
E.
hasRelationships
Indicates that an entity is connected to one or more other entities through specified types of relationships.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b0ed66481908f2e864fa550d2f1 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffb5c373948190a6606e8caa87a384 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffb261da788190b41399df8ed895e8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:10 a.m.