Triple

T29054069
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Abraham Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan E735340 entity
Predicate leniencyLevel P165964 FINISHED
Object lenient toward former Confederates LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lenient toward former Confederates | Statement: [Abraham Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan, leniencyLevel, lenient toward former Confederates]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leniencyLevel
Context triple: [Abraham Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan, leniencyLevel, lenient toward former Confederates]
  • A. hasLeniencyProgram
    Indicates that an entity offers or participates in a formal leniency program, typically reducing penalties or sanctions under specified conditions.
  • B. politenessLevel
    Indicates the degree of courteousness or respectfulness expressed by one entity toward another in an interaction.
  • C. restrictionLevel
    Indicates the degree or strictness of limitations or constraints imposed on an entity, action, or access.
  • D. enforcementStrength
    Indicates the degree or intensity with which rules, laws, or policies are applied and enforced in a given context.
  • E. sanctioningLevel
    Indicates the degree or severity of formal penalties, restrictions, or disciplinary measures imposed in response to a violation or noncompliant behavior.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077e64b88819094d37bdbca8191b3 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6609061508190ae12005d993e42bc completed May 2, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659d297cc8190b2b962ba30a1edb3 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65ad638ac8190a17bb987fce53279 completed May 2, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 10:10 a.m.