Triple

T29053858
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constable (New Zealand police rank) E735335 entity
Predicate uniformedOrPlainclothes P165963 FINISHED
Object uniformed LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uniformed | Statement: [Constable (New Zealand police rank), uniformedOrPlainclothes, uniformed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: uniformedOrPlainclothes
Context triple: [Constable (New Zealand police rank), uniformedOrPlainclothes, uniformed]
  • A. usedPlainClothes
    Indicates that an entity carried out an action or role while wearing ordinary, non-uniform clothing to avoid being recognized in an official capacity.
  • B. woreUniformOf
    Indicates that one entity was dressed in or used the official uniform associated with another entity (such as an organization, group, or role).
  • C. wearsOnUniform
    Indicates that an item is part of and is worn as a component of a uniform.
  • D. wearsUniformSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity wears a uniform that is similar in appearance or style to the uniform worn by another entity.
  • E. wearsSpecialUniforms
    Indicates that an entity regularly wears distinctive or non-standard uniforms associated with a particular role, group, or occasion.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077e64b88819094d37bdbca8191b3 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66067f58c819087237fa88ad513cb completed May 2, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659d297cc8190b2b962ba30a1edb3 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65ad638ac8190a17bb987fce53279 completed May 2, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 10:10 a.m.