Triple
T29022412
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Independencia (Line E) |
E737487
|
entity |
| Predicate | connectsWithinNetwork |
P66218
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Independencia (Line E), connectsWithinNetwork, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectsWithinNetwork Context triple: [Independencia (Line E), connectsWithinNetwork, true]
-
A.
connectsWithin
Indicates that one entity establishes a connection or link between elements that lie inside the bounds or scope of another entity.
-
B.
connectsWithMode
Indicates a relationship where one entity connects to another using a specified method, channel, or mode of connection.
-
C.
inNetwork
chosen
Indicates that one entity is within the same defined network, system, or coverage group as another entity, such that network-based interactions or benefits apply between them.
-
D.
openedOnCurrentNetwork
Indicates that an entity has been opened or accessed within the context of the currently active network or network session.
-
E.
linkedNetwork
Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or associated network relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077ee19f881909af48f9cab00a2e5 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd6a1c1c4881908090053bc359b181 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd696f24d8819091033afacbdaadc5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:50 a.m.