Triple
T29016602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPOA |
E737324
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityRepresents |
P177549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | equity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equity | Statement: [IPOA, securityRepresents, equity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityRepresents Context triple: [IPOA, securityRepresents, equity]
-
A.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
-
B.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
C.
securityFigure
Indicates that one entity serves as a protective or safeguarding presence for another, typically responsible for ensuring its safety or security.
-
D.
securityDependence
Indicates a relationship where one entity relies on another to ensure its safety, protection, or defense from threats.
-
E.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077ee19f881909af48f9cab00a2e5 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7009d39508190af7301f824615e88 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc53f4f881908dcc698687bbb64d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6ffb7554881908993d6d2ffbcf8f5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:46 a.m.