Triple
T29011803
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CompactMem |
E736584
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeIntegratedInto |
P143265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | software applications |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: software applications | Statement: [CompactMem, canBeIntegratedInto, software applications]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeIntegratedInto Context triple: [CompactMem, canBeIntegratedInto, software applications]
-
A.
mayBeIntegratedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the potential or capability to be combined or incorporated with another entity into a unified or interoperable whole.
-
B.
isIntegrableFor
Indicates that a given function or expression can be integrated with respect to a specified variable, domain, or measure.
-
C.
integratedIn
Indicates that one entity is incorporated as a component or part within a larger system, structure, or context represented by another entity.
-
D.
isIntegrableIn
Indicates that a function or expression can be integrated with respect to a given variable, domain, or measure under the specified conditions.
-
E.
canBeAddedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077eb81e88190ad9ff62cbb9f555e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fce7671f108190bf3ebf54339068b5 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fce5b5a84c81908ac1b5b9f08d48d0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:42 a.m.