Triple
T29006223
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toquepala copper deposit |
E736440
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMiningInfrastructure |
P179038
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concentrator plant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concentrator plant | Statement: [Toquepala copper deposit, hasMiningInfrastructure, concentrator plant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMiningInfrastructure Context triple: [Toquepala copper deposit, hasMiningInfrastructure, concentrator plant]
-
A.
hasMiningProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with, operates, or is responsible for a mining project.
-
B.
hasMiningActivity
Indicates that some form of mining operation or extraction activity is occurring at, involving, or associated with the referenced entity.
-
C.
hasMiningArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a designated area where mining activities take place.
-
D.
hasMiningDistrict
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a designated mining district within its domain or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasMiningDeposit
Indicates that one entity contains or is the location of a mineable natural resource deposit associated with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077eb81e88190ad9ff62cbb9f555e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f719cc31ec819099bebcf833b14d76 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71820c6c88190ab38b4fa626d22cc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f71995853c8190912025c0e83640c8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:38 a.m.