Triple
T28988262
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan–Taiwan relations |
E734749
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalBasisInJapan |
P181229
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Act on the Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Act on the Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association | Statement: [Japan–Taiwan relations, hasLegalBasisInJapan, Act on the Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalBasisInJapan Context triple: [Japan–Taiwan relations, hasLegalBasisInJapan, Act on the Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association]
-
A.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
hasLegalBasisSince
Indicates that something has had a valid legal foundation or authority starting from a specified point in time.
-
C.
legalClassificationInJapan
Indicates how something is categorized or defined under Japanese law.
-
D.
legalBasisInEU
Indicates that something (such as a measure, decision, or status) is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific legal basis within European Union law.
-
E.
legalStandingBasis
Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b0dd9b481908b7901e1c95ff6b2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f76759b3c48190ad8f1b33596f98c4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:15 a.m.